Tools for Improvement – An E-Newsletter

September 2010

Do You Manage Change, or Does Change Manage You?

Robert Eaton, former Chairman of Chrysler Corporation once said, “Any culture, be definition, exists primarily to prevent change, to set in stone the lessons of the past.”

How willing are we to embrace change?  I had a friend that always claimed he was a “change agent,” yet when it actually came down to making changes he was as resistant as any one else.  But what is change all about?  William Bridges, PhD tells us that it isn’t the changes that do you in, it’s the transitions.

Change is situational, it is an event.  Transition is psychological; it is the process that people go through as they comes to terms with the details of the new situation that change brought about.

Claes Janssen is a psychologist and writer.  He introduced the four rooms of change.  The Four Rooms of Change is a theory that deals with change, with what happens with people and organizations in change and transition and how they can influence their own and others change processes.

In Contentment you are just that — content and without a change need or demand. Your energy is focused on sustaining a good working system. Life is good — you are centered, focused, and in control.  Then! A need for change emerges. It might be internal — for example, a need for you or your group to take your work to a new level, perhaps automating a system to free up time for other pursuits. Or it could be external, like an imposed budget cut or new organization-wide program that demands a response.

When we are forced to confront external change, we go through Denial, a state of resistance where we’d just as soon not deal with the new, but stay with the old.  We believe that if we deny change, we’ll have less stress.  Yet the opposite is true.  The more we resist change, the more stress we experience.

The next stage we enter is Confusion.  This is where we accept the need for change and begin to grapple for ways to proceed beyond the known into the unknown.  The state of Confusion is actually good news because it offers s the glimmering of hope and future possibility.

We need to realize that being confused at this point is not only natural, but to be expected.  Once we see confusion as a normal reaction to change, we can quickly move beyond it.

Finally, we enter the stage of Renewal where we embrace change with enthusiasm.  We do this either be accepting change that is imposed on us or by conceiving of and implementing new ideas that may be a complete change in the way we’ve thought of and done things in the past.

From Renewal, we cycle right back to the first stage of Contentment.  Our new ideas are implemented and before we know it, our fresh concepts have become commonplace and mainstream.

Now that we understand the stages of change, what do we do as leaders to help people deal with it?

During Denial it is important for leaders to clearly explain the consequences of not changing.  Describe how the new situation will be better and more comfortable and how resisting the change will be harder than accepting it.

During Confusion, assist people through training and coaching to adapt to the new situation.  They have accepted the need to change, but lack the skills to change.  Training and coaching is the key at this stage.

During Renewal, invite their participation.  People are coming up with their own ideas on how to make things better and want to make improvements of what you have described in your initial plans.  Encourage this and provide resources to support the entrepreneurial efforts of your team.

Communication is the key during change and transition.  If people don’t know what is going on and you force them to guess, the rumor mill will take over and you will lose the initiative.  Get in front of the rumor mill with proactive communication.

{ 0 comments }

What Does The Data Tell Us?

by RWangen on August 25, 2010 · 0 comments

USA Today had an article this week about more and more passengers getting bumped from flights and often not being able to get to their final destination.  It’s true that airplanes have never been more full.  In fact, Delta, Continental, American, United, US Airways, AirTran and Alaska airlines all reported filling at least 87% of their seats for the month of July.  This doesn’t leave a lot of seats available to deal with delays and cancellations.  The article had several anecdotal examples of people who had been bumped and had big problems as a result.

Missing a connecting flight is the primary reason for missing a flight and most of the time that is due to bad weather somewhere along the airline routes.  Because the airlines can’t control the weather, they don’t owe the passenger anything, although USA Today reports that airlines sometimes provide meal and hotel vouchers for stranded passengers, regardless of the cause of the delay.

The traveler is inconvenienced, but they are compensated if they are involuntarily bumped.  Airlines are required to pay involuntarily bumped passengers an amount equal to the price of their ticket or $400 whichever is less.  If the passenger arrives at their destination more than two hours late, the cap raises to $800.

How big is the problem?  In 2009 69,416 passengers were involuntarily denied boarding.  However, when you look at how many people are flying that number amounts to only 1.19 people per 10,000 passengers boarding, or 0.0119%.  In the first half of this year that number has grown to 1.37 per 10,000 passengers boarding or 0.0137%.  Anecdotal data is entertaining, but trust the numbers. How would you like to have a business that inconveniences only 0.0137% of its customers?

Certainly it is a very big deal to you if you are the one that has been bumped, but 0.0137%?  That’s really not too bad.

{ 0 comments }

Is Your Company Socially Responsible?

by RWangen on August 23, 2010 · 0 comments

For months we have been watching the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and the devastation it has been causing the Gulf Coast.  Depending on who you talk to, the blame will be fixed on BP, the government, or just considered an accident.  Recently in Michigan we had our own version of this disaster, albeit not as big, but still bad.  An oil pipeline owned by Enbridge, an oil pipeline company, broke releasing 820,000 gallons of oil into the tributaries of the Kalamazoo River.

Both companies responded to contain the spills and recover and repair the environmental damage caused by these spills.  However, what is important here is Social Responsibility.  The social responsibility of companies has been rising higher and brighter on the radar screen for several years.   For many years, the criteria for performance excellence of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award has social responsibility as part of the Leadership category.

“Societal responsibility” is one of eleven Baldrige core values. The Leadership Category of the Baldrige Criteria asks key questions on this subject including:

  • How do you promote and assure ethical behavior in all your interactions?
  • How do you consider societal well-being and benefit as part of your strategy and daily operations?
  • How do you actively support and strengthen your key communities?

It’s no longer enough to support the employee bowling team and give to the United Way. Role-model companies are weaving Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into their strategic plans, balanced scorecards, and daily work life.  Social responsibility is not just following the laws and regulations that govern their industry, but actually seeking ways to give back to the community that houses, supports, and uses their products and services.

Going back to BP and Enbridge, how well did they execute their social responsibilities?  Fixing what they broke is not enough.  Preventing such problems is the minimum we expect from any good neighbor.  BP’s track record on safety has not been very good.  Going back years ago, even Sarah Palin in “Going Rogue” commented on a pipeline break by BP in Alaska and numerous other safety problems have been highlighted since then.  Beginning in 2002 officials of the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) noted that Enbridge’s program for identifying problems that could become catastrophic was not up to appropriate standards.  In fact, the PHMSA sent Enbridge a letter citing them for failing to meet a 180-day requirement to repair parts of its pipeline where anomalies were found.

The Baldrige questions are birth-to-grave questions about the design, production, delivery, service, and destruction/recycling of your products, facilities, and equipment.  Or, if you don’t manufacture anything, of your operations. You answer the questions as part of strategic planning and your design processes and you manage and measure your performance as part of process management.

What would our communities and our world be like if companies and organizations truly fulfilled their social responsibility to their large and small communities?  I would suspect that BP would not have taken the level of risk that they had taken the proper safety precautions, even though their costs would have increased.  The same could be said about Enbridge.  Did they have a proper surveillance plan for their pipeline?  It’s great to have an emergency response plan; that is essential.  It is even better to have a preventive maintenance plan to make it possible to never execute your emergency response plan.

{ 0 comments }

Alan Mulally and a Culture of Quality

by RWangenAugust 3, 2010 Balanced Scorecard

Tools for Improvement – An E-Newsletter
August 2010
Alan Mulally and a Culture of Quality
In the1990’s Ford Motor Company was known for high quality cars such as the Ford Taurus.  The group that design and built the Taurus, Team Taurus, was a benchmark for quality in the automotive industry.  Team Taurus employed quality tools [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Do We Over Communicate?

by RWangenJune 30, 2010 Balanced Scorecard

Tools for Improvement – An E-Newsletter
July 2010
Do We Over Communicate?
Marketing strategist, Al Ries, says, “Today, communication itself is the problem. We have become the world’s first overcommunicated society.”  The 18th-century English theologian, Joseph Priestley stated, “The more elaborate our means of communication, the less we communicate.”
We have the phone,  fax, email, Twitter, [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

It’s All About Character (and True Sportsmanship)

by RWangenJune 29, 2010 Building Teams

This story has been around for several weeks now, but it is still appropriate to bring it up again:
“On June second of this year, Armando Galarraga, a pitcher for the Detroit Tigers, was one out from pitching a perfect game, something that is rare in major league baseball. However on the last out [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Making Good Decisions

by RWangenJune 27, 2010 Leadership

William McKinley, the 25th President of the United States, once had to choose between two equally qualified candidates for a key position.  He puzzled over which one to choose until he recalled an incident that occurred in the past.
One rainy night before he became President, McKinley boarded a crowded streetcar.  One of the men he [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Should General McCrystal have been fired?

by RWangenJune 23, 2010 Character

Well it is done.  President Obama has accepted General McCrystal’s resignation.  Should this have happened?  Yes, it should.  When General McCrystal took his oath of office as an officer in the United States Army, he swore
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Team Motivation

by RWangenJune 22, 2010 Building Teams

Dallas Cowboys coach Tom Landry once said, “I don’t believe in team motivation. I believe in getting a team prepared so it knows it will have the necessary confidence when it steps on a field and be prepared to play a good game.”
Too many people believe they can motivate others to do what [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

There are choices and consequences

by RWangenJune 18, 2010 Empowerment

In an episode of “Walker, Texas Ranger,” Chuck Norris, says, “There are choices and consequences.  You make these choices and you enjoy or suffer the consequences.  These choices are up to you.”  We are faced with choices every day of our lives.  Some choices are very clear and some are pretty ambiguous.
If you look at [...]

4 comments Read the full article →
Right now on Twitter:
  •